Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X is better than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, with an 88.1 score against 74.4. The iPhone X is an notably older phone than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, but it's just a little lighter and just a little thinner anyway. IPhone X counts with a bit superior CPU than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has an inferior number of slower cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
IPhone X counts with a bit more vivid screen than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little brighter screen, a quite better 1125 x 2436 resolution and a just a little more pixels per screen inch. The Apple iPhone X features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite shoots better pictures and videos than iPhone X, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much better image and video quality, a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a bigger aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light environments.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a much longer battery life than iPhone X, because it has a 48% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.