Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel has an overall score of 80.2, which is just a bit better than OPPO Find X2 Lite's 74.4 global score. The Google Pixel is a incredibly older and just a little thicker cellphone than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, but Google was able to make it notably lighter anyway. OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a bit better performance than Google Pixel, because it has 4 more cores and 4 GB more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a little bit better looking display than Google Pixel, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bigger screen. The Google Pixel and OPPO Find X2 Lite both feature extremely similar storage to store more apps and games, both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite has a much better battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity against 2770mAh. OPPO Find X2 Lite captures much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution back camera, a bigger camera sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.