Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-21 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a has a global score of 78.8, which is a little bit better than OPPO Find X2 Lite's overall score of 74.4. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 3a has the newer 11 version and OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10 version. The Google Pixel 3a is an older and a little thicker cellphone than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, but Google managed to build it lighter anyway.
OPPO Find X2 Lite has a little better performance than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a quite bigger display.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite takes better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a way bigger back camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality, a larger aperture and a lot more MP camera.
OPPO Find X2 Lite has a very superior memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 64 GB more internal storage. The OPPO Find X2 Lite features improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 34% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.