Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-21 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL has a general score of 78.9, which is a little bit better than OPPO Find X2 Lite's global score of 74.4. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 3a XL has a more recent 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10. Although the Google Pixel 3a XL is older and just a little bit thicker than OPPO Find X2 Lite, it's construction is still just a little lighter.
OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM. The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with just a bit better display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a bit larger screen, a bit more pixels per display inch and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
OPPO Find X2 Lite takes better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a back camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution and a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photography.
OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Lite features a little better battery performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 4025mAh battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.