Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has an overall score of 82.9, which is better than the OPPO Find X2 Lite's 74.4 global score. Although Google Pixel 4a and the OPPO Find X2 Lite were only released 3 months apart, Google Pixel 4a's construction is notably lighter but just a bit thicker. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 4a has a newer 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features and performance enhancements.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite has a slightly better looking screen than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The OPPO Find X2 Lite features a bit superior CPU than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a better camera than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a much more mega pixels back-facing camera and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with as much storage to store more apps and games as the OPPO Find X2 Lite one, both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with improved battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.