Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 411 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 is slightly better than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, getting a 77.7 score against 74.4. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but HTC One M9 has the older 5.0 version while OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10 version. The HTC One M9 design is lighter than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, although it is somewhat thicker and was released 5 years before.
The HTC One M9 counts with just a little better hardware performance than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has less RAM memory, and they both have 8 cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional graphics processing unit and a 64-bits CPU. The HTC One M9 counts with a little sharper screen than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has a way smaller display and a little lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X2 Lite captures much clearer photographs and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a larger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality videos and pictures, a much larger aperture to take better low-light captures and videos and a camera in the back with a way better 48 megapixels resolution.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite features a really longer battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 4025mAh battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.