Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U Ultra is slightly better than OPPO Find X2 Lite, having a 77 score against 74.4. HTC U Ultra's design has the same thickness than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, but it's just a little bit lighter. The OPPO Find X2 Lite has a little sharper display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little lower display pixel density, it also counts with a little bigger screen.
HTC U Ultra has a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. OPPO Find X2 Lite features a bit better processing unit than HTC U Ultra, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and more cpu cores.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite has better battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 4025mAh battery size. The OPPO Find X2 Lite shoots much clearer photos and videos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a way better 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera, a bigger camera aperture and a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.