Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-21 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8 ThinQ has a score of 84.3, which is much better than the OPPO Find X2 Lite's general score of 74.4. LG G8 ThinQ's design is a little lighter than OPPO Find X2 Lite, but it's just a bit thicker and was released a bit more more than a year before. These phones use Android OS, but the LG G8 ThinQ has 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10.
The LG G8 ThinQ features a little bit better display than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same screen brightness, the LG G8 ThinQ also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px and more pixels per inch of display. The LG G8 ThinQ has a way bigger memory to install applications and games than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG G8 ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG G8 ThinQ counts with just a bit better hardware performance than OPPO Find X2 Lite, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a better camera than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and videos and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels and a much larger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs.
OPPO Find X2 Lite features just a little better battery lifetime than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 15 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.