Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-11-23 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K52 is slightly better than OPPO Find X2 Lite, with a 76 score against 74.4. Even being the best phone in this comparison review, the LG K52 design is a bit thicker and a bit heavier than the OPPO Find X2 Lite. Both of these phones include the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't see any differences regarding OS features.
OPPO Find X2 Lite features a bit faster processor than LG K52, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has more RAM. OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a sharper display than LG K52, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better screen pixel density and a much higher 1080 x 2400px resolution.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite captures much clearer photos and videos than LG K52, and although they both have a 0.5 inches back camera sensor and a back-facing camera with a 48 mega-pixels resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and videos.
LG K52 has a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG K52's battery life is just as good as OPPO Find X2 Lite's battery duration, although the LG K52 has a 1% smaller battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.