Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has a global score of 85.4, which is better than the OPPO Find X2 Lite's overall score of 74.4. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison review, LG K92's construction is just a little bit thicker and heavier than OPPO Find X2 Lite. Both phones in this comparison come with the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a little more vivid display than LG K92, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also counts with a quite greater pixel amount in each inch in the display. The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with just a bit better processing power than LG K92, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has more RAM.
LG K92 has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG K92 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG K92's battery lifetime is very similar to the battery life in OPPO Find X2 Lite, although the LG K92 has a 1 percent lower battery size.
LG K92 has a slightly better camera than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the same back-facing camera sensor size and the same video frame rate, the LG K92 also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.