Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is slightly better than OPPO Find X2 Lite, getting a general score of 81.3 against 74.4. The LG V35 ThinQ is an older phone than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, but it's lighter and just a little thinner anyway. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit superior CPU than OPPO Find X2 Lite, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
LG V35 ThinQ has a little bit better looking screen than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a higher amount of pixels per display inch. The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a superior camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also counts with a lot higher resolution camera and a much bigger sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with superior battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 22 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.