Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has a score of 81.2, which is slightly better than OPPO Find X2 Lite's global score of 74.4. LG V40 ThinQ is an older device than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, but LG was able to make it just a little thinner and just a bit lighter anyway. Both phones in this comparison include the same Android 10 OS (operating system).
The LG V40 ThinQ features a bit more powerful processor than OPPO Find X2 Lite, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The LG V40 ThinQ has a little more vivid screen than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have a display with the same size, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a higher screen density and a higher 1440 x 3120px resolution.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a much better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also counts with a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a very superior memory for games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The OPPO Find X2 Lite has better battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4025mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.