Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is better than OPPO Find X2 Lite, with an 83.4 score against 74.4. Even though Motorola Edge 40 Pro is newer than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, it's just a little heavier and a bit thicker. These devices have Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has newer 13 version while OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10 version, so it counts with some additional features.
OPPO Find X2 Lite features a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a bit better looking screen than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has a just a little lower display pixel density, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a little bit larger display and much more brightness.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures better videos and photos than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking photos and videos in low light situations, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video resolution, a much larger back-facing camera sensor and a back-facing camera with more mega-pixels.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a bit longer battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity against 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.