Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than OPPO Find X2 Lite's score of 74.4. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a newer device than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, although it is just a little thicker and a little bit heavier. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version and OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10, so it provides a lot of extra features and performance improvements.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a more vivid screen than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has a little bit lower pixel density, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a little bigger screen and much more brightness. The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots slightly better photos and videos than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rate, a better resolution camera in the back, a lot larger sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality and a bigger aperture to take better low light captures.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has 384 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features just a bit better battery duration than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.