Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play is a bit better than OPPO Find X2 Lite, getting a global score of 77.4 against 74.4. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play design is much thinner and somewhat lighter than OPPO Find X2 Lite, although it was released 3 years before. OPPO Find X2 Lite has a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a bit more pixels per display inch, a bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Moto Z2 Play features a superior storage capacity for apps and games than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with just a little better processing power than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 Lite features a greater camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a back camera with much more megapixels. The OPPO Find X2 Lite features improved battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 4025mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.