Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-05-21 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z3 is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, having a 77.6 score against 74.4. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Moto Z3 has 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10 version, so it provides you some nice extra features. The Motorola Moto Z3 body is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, even though it was released just 21 months before.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite features a bit more powerful processor than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has more RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 Lite has a slightly better screen than Moto Z3, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution, a quite bigger display and a just a little higher pixels density.
Moto Z3 counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with better battery performance than Moto Z3, because it has a 34 percent larger battery capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite has a lot better camera than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a lot better resolution back facing camera, a much larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality and a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.