Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z3 Play has a score of 76.3, which is a little bit better than OPPO Find X2 Lite's global score of 74.4. The Motorola Moto Z3 Play is an older device than OPPO Find X2 Lite, but it is somewhat lighter and thinner anyway. The OPPO Find X2 Lite has just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has more RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a little bit higher pixels density, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little larger display. OPPO Find X2 Lite captures much better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same diafragm aperture and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera with a lot higher resolution.
Moto Z3 Play has a superior storage capacity for applications and games than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with improved battery life than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.