Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper has a score of 79.8, which is a bit better than OPPO Find X2 Lite's general score of 74.4. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola One Hyper has a newer 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10, providing you some nice extra features and better performance. Even being the best device in this review, Motorola One Hyper's body is a little heavier and somewhat thicker than OPPO Find X2 Lite.
OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a slightly better looking display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite higher pixels density. The OPPO Find X2 Lite features a little bit better performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has more RAM memory.
The Motorola One Hyper features a much greater memory to install applications and games than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Hyper also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Motorola One Hyper's battery performance is just as good as the OPPO Find X2 Lite one, although the Motorola One Hyper has a 1% smaller battery size.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite has a slightly better camera than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a worse (4K) video quality and a camera with a lot lower resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low-light images and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.