Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 5S has an overall score of 76.2, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Lite's overall score of 74.4. Despite being the best in this comparison review, it must be told that it's also somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. Both phones in our current comparison include the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so both of them should offer very similar operating system features.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features a bit faster processing unit than OPPO Find X2 Lite. Both of them have 8 cores and 8 GB of RAM. The OPPO Find X2 Lite features a bit better looking display than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same display brightness, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also counts with a bit greater pixels density and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 5S takes a bit better photographs and videos than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a back-facing camera with much more megapixels, a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a larger sensor providing a better image quality.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has as much storage capacity for apps and games as OPPO Find X2 Lite, they have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has a 12 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.