Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A22 is slightly better than OPPO Find X2 Lite, having a 76.1 score against 74.4. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A22 has 12 version while OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10. Even though the Galaxy A22 is newer than OPPO Find X2 Lite, it is just a little thicker and a little heavier.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has 4 GB more RAM. The OPPO Find X2 Lite features a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a higher display pixel density and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Galaxy A22 features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1 TB. The OPPO Find X2 Lite has a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy A22.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite takes way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a way better (4K) video quality and a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photography and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.