Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-21 | 2019-04-10 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A40 is just a bit better than OPPO Find X2 Lite, getting a 79.6 score against 74.4. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A40 has a more recent 11 version and OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10, so it offers lots of additional features and increased performance. Samsung Galaxy A40's design has the same thickness than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, but it's way lighter.
OPPO Find X2 Lite features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A40, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM. OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has a just a little lower display density, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit larger display.
The Galaxy A40 counts with a greater storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The OPPO Find X2 Lite has longer battery performance than Galaxy A40, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity.
OPPO Find X2 Lite takes much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A40, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels, a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a lot bigger sensor capturing way better quality photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.