Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-21 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is better than OPPO Find X2 Lite, having a general score of 86.6 against 74.4. Both phones in this review use the same Android 10 OS, so they should provide you identical OS features. Although the Galaxy A50s and OPPO Find X2 Lite were released with only 7 months difference, the Galaxy A50s is just a bit thinner and a bit lighter.
OPPO Find X2 Lite has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a same size display, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a bit better display density and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Galaxy A50s features much more memory capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A50s also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB.
OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 Lite has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same back camera sensor size, a camera in the back with a 48 MP, the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a bigger camera aperture.
The Galaxy A50s and OPPO Find X2 Lite feature incredibly similar battery durations, although the Galaxy A50s has just 4000mAh of battery size instead of 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.