Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a general score of 85.5, which is much better than OPPO Find X2 Lite's general score of 74.4. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A51 has a more recent 11 version and OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10 version, counting with some nice extra features. The Samsung Galaxy A51 is a just a bit lighter phone than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, but both of them are 0.31inches thick.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has more RAM. The OPPO Find X2 Lite features a slightly better screen than Galaxy A51, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also counts with a bit better pixels number per display inch.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite shoots a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, a same resolution back camera, the same video frame rates and the same back-facing camera sensor size, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photos and videos.
Galaxy A51 has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A51 also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A51's battery duration is very similar to OPPO Find X2 Lite's battery duration, although the Samsung Galaxy A51 has a 1% smaller battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.