Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is much better than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, having a 90.8 score against 74.4. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's design is a little heavier and just a little bit thicker than OPPO Find X2 Lite. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has newer 11 version and OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10 version.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite features just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM. OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also counts with a just a little higher pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a much greater memory for games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB. OPPO Find X2 Lite features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same back-facing camera sensor size, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a 48 MP resolution back camera, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light images and video.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a bit better battery life than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.