Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is much better than OPPO Find X2 Lite's 74.4 global score. Even though the Galaxy A52 is newer than OPPO Find X2 Lite, it's a little bit thicker and a bit heavier. The OPPO Find X2 Lite features a little better processing power than Galaxy A52, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of display. Galaxy A52 captures slightly better videos and photos than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting photos and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot more megapixels back camera.
The Galaxy A52 features much more storage capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52 features a bit better battery duration than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.