Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is way better than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, with a overall score of 91.3 against 74.4. Although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is newer than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, it's just a little bit thicker and just a little heavier. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has newer 12 version while OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10 version.
OPPO Find X2 Lite features a slightly better display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also counts with a quite higher screen pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a bit better camera than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor and a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Galaxy A52 5G features a little longer battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has a 12 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.