Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A6 is a bit better than OPPO Find X2 Lite, getting a score of 75.8 against 74.4. Samsung Galaxy A6's body is lighter and just a little bit thinner than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, even though it was released many years before. The OPPO Find X2 Lite features a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a better pixel count per screen inch, a much better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bigger display.
OPPO Find X2 Lite has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A6, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has 5 GB more RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 Lite has a bit more memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with greater battery performance than Galaxy A6, because it has a 34% larger battery size. OPPO Find X2 Lite features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels, a way bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.