Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A7 (2017) is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, having a general score of 75.8 against 74.4. Galaxy A7 (2017)'s design has the same thickness than OPPO Find X2 Lite, but it is just a bit heavier. OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has 5 GB more RAM.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite features a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a little larger display, a bit better pixel count per inch of display and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. The OPPO Find X2 Lite features a greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
OPPO Find X2 Lite features a lot better camera than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a way more megapixels camera in the back, a larger camera aperture to capture better captures and videos in poorly lited situations and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a bit superior battery life than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 12 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.