Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has an overall score of 85.2, which is much better than OPPO Find X2 Lite's score of 74.4. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is a just a little heavier device than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, but both have the same thickness. The OPPO Find X2 Lite has a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM.
OPPO Find X2 Lite features a slightly better screen than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a just a bit better pixels density, a little larger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution. The Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rate and a F1.7 aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back camera with way more megapixels.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite features a little longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 4025mAh battery capacity against 3800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.