Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-21 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is way better than OPPO Find X2 Lite's overall score of 74.4. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS, but the Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10, providing you a couple additional features and increased performance. Galaxy Fold's construction is extremely heavier but thinner than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and both were released with only 8 months difference.
OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater display pixel density. Galaxy Fold features a bit better processor than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy Fold has a superior memory capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has 384 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy Fold has a little longer battery duration than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity. OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light images and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also counts with a much bigger sensor taking way better quality pictures and a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.