Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 411 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a score of 87.7, which is much better than OPPO Find X2 Lite's 74.4 general score. Despite being the best cellphone in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy M51's design is heavier and somewhat thicker than OPPO Find X2 Lite. These devices use the same Android 10 OS (Operating System).
OPPO Find X2 Lite has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit greater screen density. OPPO Find X2 Lite has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 captures a bit better photos and videos than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better resolution and a larger camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy M51 features a superior battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has a 74 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.