Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, getting a 98.9 score against 74.4. Even though the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device than OPPO Find X2 Lite, it must be told that it's also a just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier device. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the newer 13 version and OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10, counting with some extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little better performance than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit better screen than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has a bit higher screen density, a better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution and a bit bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a superior camera than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and videos, it also counts with a lot higher resolution back-facing camera, a much higher video resolution and a much bigger camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a bit better battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.