Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 5 is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, having a score of 79.3 against 74.4. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 5 has older 5.1 version while OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10. The Galaxy Note 5 body is just a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, even though it was released many years before.
The Galaxy Note 5 counts with a little sharper screen than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px. The OPPO Find X2 Lite has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal storage.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite has a better processor than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has more RAM memory and more CPU cores. The OPPO Find X2 Lite features greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 34% bigger battery size. OPPO Find X2 Lite captures better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a much larger back camera sensor, a bigger aperture and a much better resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.