Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a global score of 80.4, which is slightly better than OPPO Find X2 Lite's 74.4 score. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition body has the same thickness than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, but it is just a little lighter. OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite and the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition feature very similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a little bit better storage to store more apps and games than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB.
OPPO Find X2 Lite shoots greater pictures and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same diafragm aperture and the same video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a larger sensor which provides a better photo and video quality and a much more mega pixels back facing camera.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite features better battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.