Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 Lite is much better than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, having a global score of 86.2 against 74.4. Galaxy Note10 Lite is an a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker device than the OPPO Find X2 Lite. Both devices we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note10 Lite has newer 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10 version, so it provides lots of additional features and performance enhancements.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with just a little better processing power than OPPO Find X2 Lite, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also counts with a little bit higher number of pixels per inch in the display.
OPPO Find X2 Lite shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have a F1.7 aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also counts with a much more megapixels back camera and a lot larger camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a bit better battery duration than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.