Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note3 is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, getting a score of 77.7 against 74.4. The Galaxy Note3 is a notably older and a little bit thicker cellphone than OPPO Find X2 Lite, but Samsung could make it a little bit lighter anyway. Both phones in this review work with Android operating system, but Galaxy Note3 has a newer 4.4.2 version and OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10.
OPPO Find X2 Lite features just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 Lite has a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen, a little bigger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a much bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot bigger aperture to take better low light captures and video and a much more MP back camera.
OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with slightly more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Lite has improved battery duration than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 26 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.