Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note5 has a general score of 80.2, which is slightly better than the OPPO Find X2 Lite's 74.4 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy Note5 construction is a little lighter and a bit thinner than OPPO Find X2 Lite, even though it was released 5 years before. OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note5 features a screen that is very similar to the display in OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although the Galaxy Note5 has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher count of pixels per inch in the screen. The OPPO Find X2 Lite shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a much higher 48 MP resolution back-facing camera, a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography and video in poorly lited environments and a much bigger sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos.
OPPO Find X2 Lite features a much better storage for applications and games than Galaxy Note5, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with greater battery performance than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 34 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.