Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is a lot better than the OPPO Find X2 Lite's 74.4 general score. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more recent 13 version and OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction is somewhat thicker and heavier than OPPO Find X2 Lite.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels, a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit bigger display. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit faster CPU than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a better camera than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for capturing photos and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a lot higher video quality and a way higher resolution back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has improved battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.