Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S5 Sport has a general score of 77.8, which is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Lite's general score of 74.4. The Galaxy S5 Sport construction is lighter than OPPO Find X2 Lite, although it is thicker and was released 6 years before. These phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy S5 Sport has a more recent 4.4.2 version and OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10 version, so it gives some additional features.
Galaxy S5 Sport has a bit better looking screen than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per screen inch. The OPPO Find X2 Lite features a little better performance than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with 6 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores (although slower).
The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a lot bigger aperture for better captures and videos in low-light environments, a camera in the back with a way higher 48 megapixels resolution and a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
OPPO Find X2 Lite has a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. OPPO Find X2 Lite has a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.