Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-05-21 | -- |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | -- |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active is just a bit better than OPPO Find X2 Lite, getting a overall score of 80.9 against 74.4. These phones come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has 5.0 version while OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10 version. Samsung Galaxy S6 Active is a thicker but noticeably lighter device than OPPO Find X2 Lite.
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active features a bit more powerful processing unit than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has less RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an extra graphics processor and a 64-bit CPU. The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active counts with a sharper screen than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a greater camera than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a lot higher resolution camera in the back, a lot larger back camera sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality and a bigger aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited situations.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Lite features a little longer battery performance than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.