Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active is a bit better than OPPO Find X2 Lite, getting a 75.8 score against 74.4. Although it's the best cellphone we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy S7 Active is a way older, a little bit heavier and incredibly thicker cellphone than OPPO Find X2 Lite. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a little bit better display than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has a way smaller screen and a quite opaque screen, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per display inch and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
OPPO Find X2 Lite features a bit superior CPU than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a greater number of cores and 4 GB more RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a much higher resolution camera in the back.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite has a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory. OPPO Find X2 Lite and Galaxy S7 Active both have extremely similar batteries duration, although the Galaxy S7 Active has a 1 percent smaller battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.