Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 is much better than OPPO Find X2 Lite, getting a overall score of 83.3 against 74.4. The Samsung Galaxy S9 is an extremely older and just a little thicker cellphone than OPPO Find X2 Lite, but Samsung could make it just a little lighter anyway. Galaxy S9 counts with a little bit better display than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960.
Galaxy S9 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than OPPO Find X2 Lite, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy S9 has a better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 400 GB.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S9, because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera and a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with improved battery lifetime than Galaxy S9, because it has a 34 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.