Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 411 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a score of 80.1, which is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Lite's overall score of 74.4. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is an extremely thicker and noticeably heavier cellphone than OPPO Find X2 Lite. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has newer 8.0 Oreo version while OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10 version.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's processor is just as good as the OPPO Find X2 Lite one, and although the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit better screen than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
OPPO Find X2 Lite features a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a much larger camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures and a camera in the back with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has more storage capacity for apps and games than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit longer battery life than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.