Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Lite's 74.4 overall score. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy XCover Pro has a newer 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10 version, so it gives you some nice extra features and performance optimizations. Despite being the best in this review, the Galaxy XCover Pro construction is heavier and extremely thicker than the OPPO Find X2 Lite.
OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a just a bit better pixel number in each inch in the display, a little bit larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a greater storage capacity for apps and games than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB. OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a same size aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a way more megapixels back-facing camera, a lot bigger camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality and a much higher video definition.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has just a bit longer battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has a 1% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.