Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is much better than OPPO Find X2 Lite's overall score of 74.4. Galaxy Z Flip's body is a bit heavier but just a bit thinner than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and both were only released with a few months difference. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version while OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10 version.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite features a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a just a bit worse screen pixels density, a little bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit smaller screen. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a very superior memory for applications and games than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Galaxy Z Flip features a little faster CPU than OPPO Find X2 Lite. Both of them have the same number of cores and 8 GB of RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 Lite has superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 22 percent greater battery size. OPPO Find X2 Lite takes better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also counts with a way higher resolution back camera, a bigger aperture and a much bigger sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.