Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a general score of 85.6, which is much better than OPPO Find X2 Lite's overall score of 74.4. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip 3 has 11 version and OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10. Galaxy Z Flip 3's body is newer and somewhat thinner, but a little heavier than OPPO Find X2 Lite.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a little faster processing unit than OPPO Find X2 Lite. Both have a Octa-Core processor and 8 GB of RAM. The OPPO Find X2 Lite has a little sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a just a little inferior pixel count in each display inch and a quite lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a much more megapixels back-facing camera and a bigger camera aperture. OPPO Find X2 Lite and Galaxy Z Flip 3 both feature extremely similar storage for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have exactly the same internal storage capacity.
OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with greater battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 4025mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.