Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than OPPO Find X2 Lite, having a overall score of 94.6 against 74.4. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version and OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10 version, so it counts with some extra features and performance optimizations. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the OPPO Find X2 Lite were only released with a few months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is thinner but noticeably heavier.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a bit better processing power than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM. OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little longer battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Lite has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also counts with a back camera with a lot higher resolution and a bigger camera aperture to take better low light captures and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.