Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a general score of 90.6, which is way better than OPPO Find X2 Lite's score of 74.4. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a more recent 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10 version, so it gives a couple additional features and better performance. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 construction is newer and thinner, but heavier than the OPPO Find X2 Lite.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a little better performance than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM. The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher quantity of pixels in each display inch.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a greater camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a way better resolution camera in the back and a much bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures in poorly lited situations. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit better battery life than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has a 4400mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.