Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-21 | -- |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Black Shadow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a score of 91.1, which is a lot better than OPPO Find X2 Lite's overall score of 74.4. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition's design is extremely heavier but a lot thinner than OPPO Find X2 Lite. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a more recent 14 version and OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10, so it provides you a couple additional features.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a sharper screen than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has a little bit worse pixels density, it also counts with much more brightness, a larger display and a higher 1968 x 2184 pixels resolution. The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a way better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
OPPO Find X2 Lite has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because although it has a lot worse resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and videos. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a superior memory capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has more internal storage.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with just a bit longer battery duration than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.