Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-21 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Iceberg grey and Shadow black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a score of 82.9, which is much better than OPPO Find X2 Lite's 74.4 score. Although it's the best in this comparison, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro construction is thicker and heavier than OPPO Find X2 Lite. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has just a bit better processing power than OPPO Find X2 Lite. They have 8 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. The OPPO Find X2 Lite features a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, and although they both have a display with the same size, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a brighter display and a just a bit better pixel count in each inch of display.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro and OPPO Find X2 Lite feature incredibly similar storage capacity to store more games and applications, they have exactly the same internal memory. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with a battery lifetime that's very similar to OPPO Find X2 Lite's battery life, although the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a 1 percent smaller battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro takes a bit better videos and photos than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking pictures and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same resolution back camera, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same back camera sensor size, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also counts with higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.